Abuse of Human Rights

Unforgetable Remarks on Human Rights Abuse from the Past History Records

"Every Indian is a bad Indian, only a dead Indian is a good Indian." Source: Heinrich Härtle- Genocides on Indians, "Amerika's War against Germany"

American torture and scorched-earth campaigns in Phillipines General Jacob H. Smith's infamous order, "Kill everyone over ten," was the caption in the New York Journal cartoon on May 5, 1902. The Old Glory draped an American shield on which a vulture replaced the bald eagle. Caption is: "Criminals because they were born ten years before we took the Philippines."

We are used to read reports of Human rights abuse in a form like an innocent person put into imprisonment without a trial or he is ill- behaved or tortured by Local Government which is actually a narrowed picture of the subject.

Usually, when an abuse to a persons Rights in a Society takes place, is a problem of the Society, where the Social representatives can take necessary steps to solve it, as well as a problem between a person or a group of people and the Government takes place, is the countries internal political problem, which also can be solved through negotiation among the participants, where in both cases can an abuse of Human rights take place, yet remain an internal affair of the societies or countries. The worst form of human rights abuse takes place, when such abuses surpasses national Boundary and turns into “international violation of human rights” which are complicated and in most cases remain unsolved and causes Global disorder.

Most dangerous is, when a country play a “Big brother” role because of its financial and military power in the internal affairs of another country. U.S.America, U.K and Many European imperial countries to gain their financial or commercial benefits often influence poorer countries implementing their “dependency theory”, where the Governments and corporations are forced to exploit the people under poverty and abuse the rights of the people. These are the real and most serious violation of Human rights in the present world.

Abuse of Human rights was actually practiced by Societies or Nations through the Middle Age of Human History and its long process of Slavery, Colonialism and devastating Wars throughout the World.

Occupation of the Americas, killing Native Americans in Mass, occupying their land and later claiming to be their own is a shameful example of “international violation of Human rights” by the Europeans. Occupation of Indian Continent, as well as many other Countries of Asia and African Continent and through which not only certain people but countries were put into colonial Rule was “international violation of Human Rights” as well.

At the present time, the tactics of abusing human rights are changed. Slavery turned into “Modern Slavery” and colonialism into two of its wings like “internal Colonialism” and Global Colonialism (through global imperialism in the name of globalisation). These new tactics are applied, through capitalist economy Masters where mass people of the third, fourth and fifth world are only objects and are used as fuel for their money making oven.

Through “Modern Slavery” people are chained by invisible chains (but also often visible) and “internal Colonialism” arranged by the “forced” Governments and merchants who feed their foreign Master Merchants of the First World Finance Masters who count only in Millions and Billions of Dollars where people under poverty are bound to work for a Wage extreme un- equivalent with the price of Consumer goods, who hardly keep their body and soul together and enjoy no rights, is even more serious abuse of human rights.

Global colonisation, in the name of Globalisation is the Latest Art of Colonisation, in which all the mass people of the Third, fourth and fifth World are brought under global colonisation, where the rights of people are not only abused but in the real sense “seized”.

Only being conscious of “Human rights Abuse” is no more enough but enough to start thinking of defending “Global Human rights” from further abuse.

An Introduction to Human rights

Human rights refers to "the basic rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled, often held to include the right to life and liberty, freedom of thought and expression, and equality before the law." The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights states, "All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood."
The idea of human rights descended from the philosophical idea of natural rights that are provided by God, some recognize virtually no difference between the two and regard both as labels for the same thing while others choose to keep the terms separate to eliminate association with some features traditionally associated with natural rights. John Locke is perhaps the most important philosopher that developed this theory.

The Magna Carta or "Great Charter" was the world's first document containing commitments by a sovereign to his people to respect certain legal rights

Human rights history "It is not a treaty...[In the future, it] may well become the international Magna Carta." Eleanor Roosevelt with the Spanish text of the Universal Declaration in 1949 Appalled by the barbarism of the Second World War, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. While not legally binding, it urged member nations to promote a number of human, civil, economic and social rights, asserting these rights are part of the "foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world". The declaration was the first international legal effort to limit the behavior of states and press upon them duties to their citizens following the model of the rights-duty duality.

Many states wanted to go beyond the declaration of rights and create legal covenants which would put greater pressure on states to follow human rights norms. Because some states disagreed over whether this international covenant should contain economic and social rights (which usually require a greater effort to fulfill on the part of individual states), two treaties were prepared.

In 1976, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights was adopted by the United Nations. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights came into force in 1976. It commits 155 state parties to work toward the granting of economic, social, and cultural rights (ESCR) to individuals. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (abbreviated UDHR) is a non-binding declaration adopted by the United Nations General Assembly (A/RES/217, 1948-12-10 at Palais de Chaillot, Paris).

Since then several other pieces of legislation have been introduced at the international level:

• Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (entry into force: 1951)
• Convention against Torture (entry into force: 1984)
• Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (entry into force: 1969)
• Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (entry into force: 1981) [http//www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/frame.htm]
• Convention on the Rights of the Child (entry into force: 1989)
• Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (entry into force: 2002)

With the exception of the non-deformable human rights (the four most important are the right to life, the right to be free from slavery, the right to be free from torture and the right to be free from retroactive application of penal laws), the UN recognises that human rights can be limited or even pushed aside during times of national emergency - although "the emergency must be actual, affect the whole population and the threat must be to the very existence of the nation. The declaration of emergency must also be a last resort and a temporary measure". Conduct in war is governed by International Humanitarian Law.

International bodies
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights created an agency, the Human Rights Committee to promote compliance with its norms. The 18 members of the committee express opinions as to whether a particular practice is a human rights violation, although its reports are not legally binding.
A modern interpretation of the original Declaration of Human Rights was made in the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action adopted by the World Conference on Human Rights in 1993. The degree of unanimity over these conventions, in terms of how many and which countries have ratified them varies, as does the degree to which they are respected by various states. The UN has set up a number of bodies to monitor and study human rights, under the leadership of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR).

Regional legislation
There are also many regional agreements and organisations governing human rights including the European Court of Human Rights, which is the only international court with jurisdiction to deal with cases brought by individuals (rather than states); the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights; Inter-American Commission on Human Rights; Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam; Inter-American Court of Human Rights; and Iran's Defenders of Human Rights Center.

Human Rights in the ancient world
Ur-Nammu, king of Ur in ca. 2050 BC created the Code of Ur-Nammu, the oldest legal codex that survives today. Several other sets of laws were created in Mesopotamia including the Code of Hammurabi, (ca. 1780 BC) which is one of the best preserved examples of this type of document. It shows rules and punishments if those rules are broken on a variety of matters including women's rights, children's rights and slave rights.
Elsewhere, societies have located the beginnings of human rights in religious documents. The Vedas, the Bible, the Qur'an and the Analects of Confucius are some of the oldest written sources which address questions of people’s duties, rights, and responsibilities.

Persian Empire

The Cyrus cylinder of Cyrus the Great, founder of the Achaemenid Persian Empire The Achaemenid Persian Empire of ancient Iran established unprecedented principles of human rights in the 6th century BC under Cyrus the Great. After his conquest of Babylon in 539 BC, the king issued the Cyrus cylinder, discovered in 1879 and recognized by many today as the first human rights document. The cylinder declared that citizens of the empire would be allowed to practice their religious beliefs freely.

It also abolished slavery, so all the palaces of the kings of Persia were built by paid workers in an era where slaves typically did such work. These two reforms were reflected in the biblical books of Chronicles and Ezra, which state that Cyrus released the followers of Judaism from slavery and allowed them to migrate back to their land. The cylinder now lies in the British Museum, and a replica is kept at the United Nations headquarters.
In the Persian Empire, citizens of all religions and ethnic groups were also given the same rights, while women had the same rights as men. The Cyrus cylinder also documents the protection of the rights to liberty and security, freedom of movement, the right of property, and economic and social rights.

Maurya Empire
The Maurya Empire of ancient India established unprecedented principles of civil rights in the 3rd century BC under Ashoka the Great. After his brutal conquest of Kalinga in circa 265 BC, he felt remorse for what he had done, and as a result, adopted Buddhism. From then, Ashoka, who had been described as "the cruel Ashoka" eventually came to be known as "the pious Ashoka". During his reign, he pursued an official policy of nonviolence (ahimsa) and the protection of human rights, as his chief concern was the happiness of his subjects. The unnecessary slaughter or mutilation of animals was immediately abolished, such as sport hunting and branding. Ashoka also showed mercy to those imprisoned, allowing them outside one day each year, and offered common citizens free education at universities. He treated his subjects as equals regardless of their religion, politics or caste, and constructed free hospitals for both humans and animals. Ashoka defined the main principles of nonviolence, tolerance of all sects and opinions, obedience to parents, respect for teachers and priests, being liberal towards friends, humane treatment of servants, and generosity towards all. These reforms are described in the Edicts of Ashoka.
In the Maurya Empire, citizens of all religions and ethnic groups also had rights to freedom, tolerance, and equality. The need for tolerance on an egalitarian basis can be found in the Edicts of Ashoka, which emphasize the importance of tolerance in public policy by the government. The slaughter or capture of prisoners of war was also condemned by Ashoka. Slavery was also non-existent in ancient India.

Philosophy of human rights
Theory of value and property
John Locke uses the word property in both broad and narrow senses. In a broad sense, it covers a wide range of human interests and aspirations; more narrowly, it refers to material goods. He argues that property is a natural right and it is derived from labour."  In addition, property precedes government and government cannot "dispose of the estates of the subjects arbitrarily." Karl Marx later critiqued Locke's theory of property in his social theory. To deny valid property rights according to Locke is to deny human rights. The British philosopher had significant impacts upon the development of the Government of the UK and was central to the fundamental founding philosophy of the United States of America.
Types
A few groups, such as libertarians, conceptually divide rights into negative and positive rights. By this distinction, "negative" human rights, which follow mainly from the Anglo-American legal tradition, are rights that a government and/or private entities may not take action to remove. For example, right to life and security of person; freedom from slavery; equality before the law and due process under the rule of law; freedom of movement; freedoms of speech, religion, assembly; the right to bear arms. These have been codified in documents including the Scottish Claim of Right, the English Bill of Rights the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the United States Bill of Rights and Fourteenth Amendment.
This distinction holds that "Positive" human rights mainly follow from the Rousseauian Continental European legal tradition and denote entitlements that the state is obliged to protect and provide. Examples of such rights include: the rights to education, to health care, to a livelihood. Such 'positive rights' have been codified in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Articles 22-28) and in many 20th-century constitutions.
Another categorization, offered by Karel Vasak, is that there are three generations of human rights: first-generation civil and political rights (right to life and political participation), second-generation economic, social and cultural rights (right to subsistence) and third-generation solidarity rights (right to peace, right to clean environment). Out of these generations, the third generation is the most debated and lacks both legal and political recognition. Some theorists discredit these divisions by claiming that rights are interconnected. Arguably, for example, basic education is necessary for the right to political participation.
Some human rights are said to be "inalienable rights." This is not a term that has a precise meaning today, but is a term from English property law, used metaphorically, and is usually a reference to the United States Declaration of Independence, emphasizing the importance of a claimed right.

National human rights institutions
In over 110 countries National human rights institutions (NHRIs) have been set up to protect, promote or monitor human rights in a given country. There are now over 110 such bodies. Not all of them are compliant with the United Nations standards as set out in the 1993 Paris Principles, but the amount and effect of these institutions is increasing.

Criticism of human rights
One of the arguments made against the concept of human rights is that it suffers from cultural imperialism. In particular, the concept of human rights is fundamentally rooted in a politically liberal outlook which, although generally accepted in Western Europe, Japan, India and North America, is not necessarily taken as standard elsewhere. An appeal is often made to the fact that influential human rights thinkers, such as John Locke and John Stuart Mill, have all been Western and indeed that some were involved in the running of Empires themselves. The cultural imperialism argument achieves even greater potency when it is made on the basis of religion. Some histories of human rights emphasise the Christian influence on the agenda and then question whether this is in keeping with the tenets of other world religions. For example, in 1981, the Iranian representative to the United Nations, Said Rajaie-Khorassani, articulated the position of his country regarding the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by saying that the UDHR was "a secular understanding of the Judeo-Christian tradition", which could not be implemented by Muslims without trespassing the Islamic law.
A final set of debating points revolves around the question of who has the duty to uphold human rights. Human rights have historically arisen from the need to protect citizens from abuse by the state and this might suggest that all mankind has a duty to intervene and protect people wherever they are. Divisive national loyalties, which emphasise differences between people rather than their similarities, can thus be seen as a destructive influence on the human rights movement because they deny people's innately similar human qualities. But others argue that state sovereignty is paramount, not least because it is often the state that has signed up to human rights treaties in the first place. Commentators' positions in the argument for and against intervention and the use of force by states are influenced by whether they believe human rights are largely a legal or moral duty and whether they are of more cosmopolitan or nationalist persuasion.

Human rights violations
Human rights violation is abuse of people in a way that it abuses any fundamental human rights. It is a term used when a government violates national or international law related to the protection of human rights. According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, fundamental human rights are violated when, among other things:

A certain race, creed, or group is denied recognition as a "person". (Articles 2 & 6) Men and women are not treated as equal. (Article 2) Different racial or religious groups are not treated as equal. (Article 2) Life, liberty or security of person is threatened. (Article 3) A person is sold as or used as a slave. (Article 4) Cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment is used on a person (such as torture or execution). (Article 5) (See also Prisoners' rights) Victims of abuse are denied an effective judicial remedy. (Article 8)

Punishments are dealt arbitrarily or unilaterally, without a proper and fair trial. (Article 11) Arbitrary interference into personal, or private lives by agents of the state. (Article 12) Citizens are forbidden to leave or return to their country. (Article 13) Freedom of speech or religion is denied. (Articles 18 & 19) The right to join a trade union is denied. (Article 23) Education is denied. (Article 26)

Human rights violations and abuses include those documented by non-governmental organizations such as Amnesty International, Peace World Wide, Human Rights Watch, World Organisation Against Torture, Freedom House, International Freedom of Expression Exchange and Anti-Slavery International. Only a very few countries do not commit significant human rights violations, according to Amnesty International. In their 2004 human rights report (covering 2003) the Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, Iceland and Costa Rica are the only (mappable) countries that did not violate at least some human rights significantly.
Some people believe human rights abuses are more common in dictatorships or theocracies than in democracies because freedom of speech and freedom of the press tend to uncover state orchestrated abuse and expose it. Nonetheless human rights abuses do also occur in democracies. For example, Amnesty International has called the running of Guantanamo Bay detainment camp by the United States "a human rights scandal" in a series of reports.

 

 

See also:	An Introduction | Universal Declaration | Cairo Declaration | Countries abusing Human Rights | Records from the Past | Other Categories | Chinese Reports
GO TO:	FEEDBACK • CONTACT • ARCHIVE • PUBLICATION •
Created by:	Salauddine Mohammed Faruque on July 25,2007, last updated on 12.10.2007